Why admixture calculators disagree — and which number to believe
The same genome scores 44% North European in one calculator and 51% in another. Component anchoring, reference panels, the calculator effect and K explain the spread — and none of the numbers is 'the real one'.
Related posts
qpAdm vs ADMIXTURE: two methods papers use, two different questions
ADMIXTURE describes structure with K inferred components; qpAdm tests an explicit historical model and can reject it. What each estimates, why papers use both, and which answers which of your questions.
3 min read
What is an admixture calculator? How ancestry percentages are actually computed
Every admixture calculator — GEDmatch's classics, Global25 fits, testing-company estimates — is an optimiser that cannot say no. How the three families work, what the percentages mean, and the questions a calculator can and cannot answer.
5 min read
GEDmatch admixture calculators explained: Eurogenes, Dodecad, HarappaWorld, MDLP, puntDNAL
Which GEDmatch admixture project to run for your background, what each calculator's components mean, why the projects disagree with each other, and what has aged since 2012–2016.
4 min read